Redefining my art: A new website, a new Instagram handle (#modularvideo), and a new scanlines account . . .
I’ve been shooting television for decades, acquiring a pretty fair skillset in lighting and photography, so I’ve been really drawn to re-enter the art (my first video art project was decades ago using a Grass Valley 300 switcher, luma-keyed hand-burnished Letraset type, live models, and chroma-keyed goldfish in a tank, all recorded to a Sony BVH-1000 one-inch Type-C machine).
From my spray-painted ode to Pong in the basement of CalArts, witness to numerous Nam Jun Paik-esque installations, and now living a world of super-chipped GLSL-shaders and sub-$500 65" LED screens, video has come a long way.
Traditional narrative filmmaking is difficult to do well (and hella expensive), but I’ve also always been interested in 2D-design and typography (doing some layout and pre-press work in my former marketing career), and video-synthesis may encompass all of this. New tools coming from LZX, combined with gems from BPMC and Syntonie, as well as upcycled consumer and broadcast gear, I feel well-armed to approach this new genre.
But what is it?
I’ve been mentally attempting to craft the “format.” Not in a general, philosophic way, but in a specific, storyboard-like paradigm. Again, stripped of the conformities of narrative filmmaking or traditional television fare, attempting to define my new “format” has been both challenging and exciting.
So inspiration is called for . . . I happened to find that in another eBay find: Leader 408 NTSC pattern-generator; I’ll start with a test-pattern!
###
Sources: I’ve been concentrating on building an infrastructure for multiple sources for playback (I shoot all of my own photography and video source-footage). I got some Sony VCRs, all with front-panel tracking controls, plus a very pricey digital playback device, a Roland P-20HD which is excellent for this application.
The Leader test-generator is part of this; another video-source for glitch-fodder. And “different” is always good. I also like the idea of juxtapositioning pristine images with degraded/glitched ones.
I just thought of re-purposing my storyboard software. Very expensive, and I never really used it. I have a couple of character add-on packs. It’s basically a pre-viz app used by director/screenwriters, a crude sort of animation-like creator. Then again, this probably a stupid idea.
I have a fair backlog of raw footage from my short film projects, much of it you will see re-purposed for glitch. Of course I have new plans to shoot video specific for glitching, and have ample tools to tackle the job (e.g., two Super35 digital cine-cameras, a Steadicam, track-dolly, etc.). Already shot some desert footage on my Sony FS100 I’ve yet to ingest. But it’s the more studio set-up stuff I’d like to shoot (I also have a high-speed camera; so like a girl opening a shook-up can Coke at 240fps).
This all follows the same theme I was using back at CalArts: Typical “glamour” images (portrait-like shots of a pretty girl), flash-cut with sweep-table shots of consumer products. This time, I’ll contrast these with the damaged images. Or maybe discarded or naturally degraded or spoiled things, stuff that’s no longer shiny and new, trash. Trying to avoid the perception as a “message” piece (too on the nose); just seeking images with visual contrast.
But the “new” “old” trope, or “pretty” “ugly,” sounds as tired as old shoes now that I write it out load. Like I said, I’m searching for a new approach. A fresh take. Another way of thematically connecting contiguous images.
I also used a lot of transportation motifs, only because I find them interesting. So I have a lot of footage of jet planes, subways, trains; though, a bit short on cars and freeways (will remedy that soon).
I need a vehicle-mount with a PTZ-controllable camera with remote iris-control. Only the Panasonic prosumer camcorders’ LANC-C type connection also carries iris-control data. The pile of used APS-C Sony mirrorless cameras I bought recently don’t.