@autr, this is not acceptable material to post on this forum. not only is it irrelevant to the main topic, but you’re coming here to complain about a moderator of a different forum (the Video Circuits group) for moderating you for the same reason. i have flagged this topic and removed your status as a moderator of this forum. please, don’t continue to post about these things or i’ll need to take further action.
I had a long and productive conversation with Chris, we identified 5 rationales why my behaviour is unacceptable, and I think it is worthwhile analysing these, or if it is OK with Chris, then posting the discourse as an insight into the issue at hand, and the different misgivings or fear-mongering that is done about my purported intentions.
The issue is that some individuals tend to be alarmed, when there is anything like this, as though feeling “is this all about me” -a nd this appears to coalesce into a collaborative effort to then gaslight or silence the individual, as well as spread the concern-trolling rumours around the individual’s strange behaviour, their purported mental illness.
It also funnels qualitative information towards those who might want to gain advantage by asking after the facts and sympathising, in order to use it in their own narratives, within the competitive dynamics of music, arts, cultural scenes. This is unhealthy, and my intention is to “cause a stink” about credible evidence IC community have been infiltrating as many artistic / music / cultural scenes as possible.
Is this acceptable to you Paloma? It would be like a thesis, and I will try to make diagrams or tables, visual aids to communicate what I am trying to explain and collectively warn you about, not personally attack the community.
On this, I think I had legitimate criticism of Chris, even though he is inundated with managing all of us in the main Facebook group, just as he had legitimate criticism of my tone and provocation, however I hold that what I am talking about is within the “public interest”, not least what I described to others as “Black-Mirroring” or contemporary Zersetzung, by the UK.
no, it’s not acceptable to post further about these topics. this forum is not the venue for this type of material, and that is not going to change. i will not discuss this further.
Where then is? I believe Timothy Caldwell pays for the server, and you would not be in the position to make this call, unless you gain his agreement. I too am a moderator, so is this a coup, and why? What do you believe my intentions are, and do you think I am targeting a specific group or people? I have tried to make it clear elsewhere why this is not the case.
you are showing by your words and actions that you do not understand several basic things about what this message board is for and how is run, organized, moderated, and funded. you have already broken the rules about what is acceptable to post here. the best thing you could possibly do right now is to take a deep breath and refrain from replying on this topic for at least 48 hours, and ideally, upon having enough time to reflect on your actions, never again.
we are saying this as people who have good intentions towards you and would like you to continue being an active member of this online community. however, you do need to understand about what is and is not appropriate topics here. nothing you have written in these posts is appropriate for discussion in scanlines, and we will not engage with you further if you continue to press us on this.
this has escalated to harassment. the user has been silenced.